Summit SUMMIT MEETING IN XXI CENTURY NATIONAL ORGANIZING THE THIRD MEETING OF ARTISTS The idea of \u200b\u200borganizing the third meeting had its seed in the retrospective exhibition was done to the late artist and member of First meeting Juan Pablo Renzi in OSDE Foundation of Buenos Aires. They chatted with Silvina Buffone (curator of the show) Luis Wells, Adriana Bianchi, Jorge Peirano and later with Juan Carlos Romero, who had agreed that if there was need for it was worth trying a convocatoria.El first step is to present a guest with the most important issues that concern us, so through the network
redencuentrosenlacumbre@gruposyahoo.com.ar we will communicate these inquietudes.El second step is: to propose a physical place to meet and date tentativa.Por a colleague please open the home page of matches.
www.groups.yahoo.com / group / redencuentrosenlacumbre colleague Please Subscribe, contribute ideas and receive information, the network is our tool to communicate
Posted by Jorge Peirano in
Sunday April 18, 2010
GAMES ARE NOT ALONE ... AT THE SUMMIT: A MEETING healthy and refreshing
Title: "Close Encounters of The Summit"
Date of work: 12 to December 16, 1990
Technique: Auto call pluralistic solidariaMedidas: Ushuaia to QuiacaSección: macro work colectivaAutores: Miguel Ocampo, Luis Wells, Gustavo Grundy Emma Gargiulo, Bettina Muraña, Jorge Peirano, Angelines Saenz, Julia Alurralde, Eduardo Garcia Sáez, Edward Pearson, Luz Reynal, Lisa Wells, Solange Bunge, Richard Bunge, Jose M. Suhurt.Desde Buenos Aires: White Carusillo, Ricardo Roux, Carlos Alonso, Raúl Alonso, Luis F. Benedit, Remo Bianchedi, Ricardo Carpani, Américo Castilla, Miguel Davila, Nicolas Garcia Uriburu, Enio Iommi, Keneth Kemble, Carlos de la Mota, Adolfo Nigro, Luis Felipe Noe, Pedro Pont Vergés, Alejandro Puente, Juan P. Renzi, Pablo Suarez, Clorindo Testa. And 700 artists.
Comments: As a work of art made individually by each artist in his studio, can not be said of "Close Encounters of The Summit" has started on 12 December, far from there ended when the last of the pilgrims boarded the last bus on Sunday. From our point of view we can consider EeC artists as a collective macro work, perhaps the most powerful group initiative undertaken and successfully completed by the artists of our country so far. We all know from our personal experience at the workshop that somewhere in the creative process, the work, like a golem brought to life and goes some way, making themselves unpredictable growth in scope and dimensions which can only be measured over time. EeC is just the initial fission reaction released a string, which may exceed the boundaries of our century, projected to the third milenio.Esto extremely ambitious, but in fact our purpose is humble, just trying to emerge from isolation and individualism in which the pride of our enlightened predecessors, and why not our own, we fell. Encapsulated in a cryptic language, sheltered from the outside world by a placenta from friends, colleagues marchans, critics and connoisseurs, the artists we have become an alien and superfluous excrescence that serves no practical function in society, almost abstract entity which often unfairly blamed him and many others with fairness, our ills. This was discussed in the workshops for five sunny days, which mirrors Buenos Aires cafes, the innocent mountain village of La Cumbre. Here algunasDe most pressing questions that were asked: Is it possible for artists to become aware of ourselves as cultural body? Is it possible to reverse our isolation by immersing ourselves socially with a clearly defined professional role? In our culture of fusion, can we talk about identity?. In this impoverished economy, can create from our own artists rather than a demand for art?. Except in the table discussed matters relating to our business union, highly fruitful debate since it was made very specific lines of action (Review of all national and provincial legislation on works of art, legal mechanisms to encourage the sponsoring employer, union status, social work and pensions for artists), most meeting participants proposed tentative solutions such as the inclusion of reproductions container industry (record once considered demeaning) or miniseries television broadcast on artists ... what is the role of education was a matter that we can not ascertain that ran aground in the impasse of theoretical wander. It is a scientific axiom that to get a correct answer is essential before formulating the right question. All we go the meeting full of anxiety, but anxiety is not the same question. Do not take this as a sign yet that the meeting was a failure. First, because it can not be something that has not failed over. Second, because EeC was a success. In a word (a word which, by devalued, usually ashamed) was beautiful. It was beautiful to get to the summit to find that WE ARE NOT ALONE. It was beautiful to work closely and discuss the college student and professional with thirty years of experience, to discover that besets us all in higher and lower común.Precisamente as a vital issue, the most notable feature of the meeting was the horizontal, this total absence of egocentric, this healthy, refreshing and demystifying modesty. Healthy and refreshing as spring water of the mountain was a little manifesto issued by the table "Miscellaneous" (renamed Macedonia, Cuyo four, happily jumping the generation gap from La Cumbre to envision the future (the future) of art. Healthy toxic and as refreshing as the rain that we received (as the Chinese, every major storm is good sign ... at least for those who survive it) was installed by Rosario Rozart group, composed of Beatriz Vignoli , Gabriela Aloras, Veronica Serra, Marco Cattaneo, Oscar Vega, Hugo cava, Gabriela Gabelich, Silvina Buffone, Pancho Vignolo, Aurelio Garcia, Cesar Baracca, Cristina Olguin, Miguel Pesserini, Victor Gomez. This handful of young cheeky had the chutzpah to pay homage to the commission of honor with a series of pastiches arranged along (... and height) of the Cross the way to Christ's place. "I think we hit the nail was worth the disrespect our comment unanimous see tears in his eyes as keen as those of John P Renzi, Louis Wells, and Kenneth" Boys Do not Cry "Kemble.Pero usually are not in the but on the flat summit. Close Encounters of The Summit continues. How many Sometimes we have said that in the era of computer geographical distances deleted?. Now we know that is not an empty phrase. EeC already proposed a first line of action. The creation of an organic network of self-management and open communication to keep us all country artists who wish to participate actively, responsible and caring attitude, and what we call an artistic attitude, creativity, critical insights, delivery , risk. All that is alive, now faces a risk not only of individual death, but the collective death, represented not so much about a possible nuclear holocaust but the real fact of extinction of species. The Active participation in a living organism, the network will ensure that artists do not extinguish us as a species. Only in the mobile space can coexist language diversity. Then continue this dialogue. Against entropy: growth. Address the lack of power monolithic, self-management. Today's Summit, tomorrow's first colony on Mars. "NO MORE SUICIDES" We are not alone, could be a slogan (and not only) the next meeting.
Beatriz Vignoli - Rosario 20 December 1990Para contact:
Posted by Jorge Peirano on Thursday April 15, 2010
OBJECTIVES OF THE FIRST AND SECOND NATIONAL ARTISTS In December 1990, organized by a group of artists was held at La Cumbre, Cordoba First National Encounter of Plastic Artists, bringing together about 500 artists from around the country. In September 1991 a meeting was convened at the Centro Cultural Recoleta in Buenos Aires in order to inform the artists featured on the 1990 meeting, answer questions and suggest new topics and new venue for the next encuentro.En that time was proposed San Juan as the site of Encuentro.A II made a province of Cuyo, it serves the purpose of decentralizing the cultural, calling attention to a little known province culturally from the rest of país.Se had the sponsorship and collaboration of the Universidad Nacional de San Juan, Secretariat of Culture of the Province, Municipality of the Capital, Department of Tourism and the consensus of a large group of artists in the province. . It could have an audience of unique features to deliver a great exposición.El auspices of the University allowed to have an administrative infrastructure, a residence hall, conference rooms and dining universitario.Estas endorsed reasons that will be accepted in San Juan to host the II EncuentroLa date was set on 23-24-25-and 26 April THE FIRST 1992.OBJETIVO
convene a meeting open, not exclusive cosmetic lines, without preconceptions union order, or commercial, or political, to overcome isolation and aislamienmto that, in different regions of the country, currently characterizes our trabajo.Poner raised the most important value we can transmit which is to our ideas, our images and our own work and therefore hopes that through the exchange of ideas and experiences and mutual understanding of our past, to achieve the full extent of the country a better flow in our relationships and activities . For this was resolved the following agenda: a) Awareness of body culturalb) Identidadc) Gremialesd) Enseñanzae) Relationship with galleries and críticosf) Diffusion in sociedadg) Miscellaneous
SECOND GOAL OF
Implement mechanisms to move from ideas and proposals made at the first meeting, in its implementation, as well as to discuss new issues and this propuestas.Para resolved the following agenda: a) Creating a network of comunicación.b) Creation of a database datosc) Annual Guide argentinosd artists) Implementation of National Artists relevamento) Development of projects for the dissemination of visual art contemporáneo.f) Techniques and sponsorship management patrocinios.g) Rethinking Policy and National Salons Regionalesh) alternative spaces of exposición.i) What can the artist to restore their relationship with the público.j) Discussion of the mechanisms and organizational forms that allow for active involvement of artists in the discussion and formulation of laws and regulations affecting its business. k) Teaching of the arts. Educativa.l Policy) Art as a form of knowledge. Possible areas of research and new functions.
Posted by Jorge Peirano in
Red
summit meetings, is the national network of Argentine artists Redencuentrosenlacumbre proposes: ART SUMMIT
XXI - Third National Meeting of Argentine artists. First meeting was
: Meeting at the Summit - Córdoba
second meeting was: Meeting at the Summit - San Juan
third meeting will be: Summit Art XXI in a place to propose
Redencuentrosenlacumbre Objectives:
1) Communicate and communicate proposals , ideas, referred to organize SUMMIT ART XXI
2) promote the dissemination of Summit Art XXI
3) Organize the survey of new generations of artists from all provinces.
4) recover the memory of artists missing or forgotten by many circumstances.
5) Organize a database which can be accessed by any artist in the country through network.
REQUIREMENTS: * Solve the place and date of the third meeting. (Any proposal suggested with pros and cons should have a basis of certainty to materialize)
* Questionnaire to send and answer: Which of all the topics covered in the past considered the most important meetings? * Suggest new issues as it considers .
DECEASED TRIBUTE TO ARTISTS: Suggest a tribute to artists who participated in the meetings and who died in the fecha.Ej: Kenett Kemble - Raul Alonso - Juan Pablo Renzi - Artemio Alisio and some other artist to help us expand recordar.Se The Blog with a history of past meetings for those who did not participate or with a weak memory are cleared I tried a bit at that time.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}